shinygerbil wrote:Cooper42: If someone says something on Day 1, it still counts, even if it is Day 1. A wolf is a wolf even on Day 1.
Yeah, but most of us have such precious little to go on and so have baulked at openly casting suspiscion in any meaningful way.
And so, zjoere's attempt to raise suspiscions by giving flaky reasoning was itself, very suspicious. Which I guess was your argument.
But contradicting yourself the way you did (stating Jordy's presence helps wolves, then not voting for Jordy) seems to suggest an attempt to turn the bandwagon into something divisive. Surely if you wanted to re-dress the bandwagon because you believe Jordy to be human (which I'm tempted to agree with giving his posting), the obvious choice would be to join the collection of votes around Feud?
But as the first to openly, and without subtlety, stir things up by trying to manipulate our suspsicions and then give such an odd vote without rationale...
I'm going to assume and/or hope this isn't some master plan between you and zjoere to confuzzle us all.
So, yeah,
zjoere too. Not as an alternative vote to the almost-certain lynching of Jordy, but as a record that I think zjoere's interventions today have seemingly been deliberately the least helpful.
Whoever you vote for, the government wins.