Xocrates wrote:You know, the analogy kind of fails when you go beyond the general "should or should not exist" because then we are confronted with the fact that guns and games (and who should own them) are very different.
How do you reward gun owners for "doing the right thing"? What even is the "right thing" in this case anyway? If we consider the analogy the "wrong thing" would be to get weapons in the black market, which I doubt even you think would be a good idea.
I disagree, this isn't about buying guns legally or illegally. Rather, we've been discussing responsible ownership.
The wrong thing (based upon my statement that people should seek education) would be to use a firearm while ignorant to the basic safety rules and skills necessary to do so responsibly. The right thing would be to become properly instructed on responsible use and ownership.
There are any number of ways to promote this, such as a one time tax credit for taking a State certified course, discounts at public ranges (many ranges here are owned and operated by the State for public use) for those who have passed a State certified course, requiring State certification to shoot on State owned land (including public ranges), sales tax reduction on firearms/ammo/accessories, increased medical insurance rates for those who have not taken one (similar to increased auto insurance rates for those who haven't taken driver's ed), etc.
Some people will do the right thing because it's the right thing, others will with the proper motivation, and I can think of few better ways to motivate someone
than appealing to their wallet.