new game mode:population grow

Ideas for expansions and improvements to Defcon

Moderator: Defcon moderators

User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

new game mode:population grow

Postby trickser » Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:36 pm

i think a game mode where your population can grow would be fun.

1. possibility: your pop grows the same amount u hit other players pop. either your cities grow proportional or every hit to others citys gives the pop to a random city of u. +1 for kills and -1 for death might work best. You will need to attack and to defend, which may lead to new strategies.

2. possibility: your pop grows by itself. It has a birth rate. So bigger pops grow faster. +1 for kill -2 for death makes u wanna protect ur civ, but the later the game the more value has an attack.

This just came to my mind and here is the place to tell it.
User avatar
Xocrates
level5
level5
Posts: 5262
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:34 pm

Postby Xocrates » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:16 pm

Who is this "u" you speak of, and why does he want to protect "ur civ"?
User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

Postby trickser » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:36 pm

u is short for you and ur civ means your civilization. This is a short chatting style.
You must be new to the Internet. Welcome :P
User avatar
rus|Mike
level5
level5
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:52 pm
Location: Russia, St. Petersburg

Postby rus|Mike » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:43 pm

trickser wrote: This is a short chatting style.

Do you see a chat any near? I don't.
User avatar
Ace Rimmer
level5
level5
Posts: 10803
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: The Multiverse

Postby Ace Rimmer » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:45 pm

rus|Mike wrote:
trickser wrote: This is a short chatting style.

Do you see a chat any near? I don't.

I'm guessing you meant "any where" as opposed to "any near" which doesn't make sense. ?
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast...
User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

Postby trickser » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:52 pm

please relax people, welcome me to the board, and say somthing to the topic.
:( all this nitpicking

btw (by the way) english is a foreign language and my spelling, gramma and so on sucks badly, be nice to me
User avatar
rus|Mike
level5
level5
Posts: 2750
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:52 pm
Location: Russia, St. Petersburg

Postby rus|Mike » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:52 pm

I meant what I said :P "any near" means any location near this place (topic).
User avatar
xander
level5
level5
Posts: 16869
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Highland, CA, USA
Contact:

Postby xander » Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:15 pm

trickser wrote:u is short for you and ur civ means your civilization. This is a short chatting style.
You must be new to the Internet. Welcome :P

No, he knows exactly what you were saying, and was trying to politely chide you into being a good citizen of the boards here by letting you know that we don't generally like those kinds of abbreviations here. You are obviously a bit to dense to have figured that out, so let me explain it to you: if it is worth writing, it is worth writing in full. Don't use fucking 1337 or txtspk. They are annoying, hard to read, and immediately give the impression that you are an immature teenage twit.

Welcome to the boards.

xander
User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

Postby trickser » Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:39 pm

I understood what he said, but he also understood me. His question was just ironic and so was my answer.:roll:
And as you can see, i am already enforcening myself to write correctly (you can see that in my 1st post too), but these shortcuts keep slipping out of my fingers.
Dont nitpick! Thats bad style. Offending too! ("dense" pffff)
User avatar
Rogviler
level2
level2
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 3:38 am
Location: Here

Postby Rogviler » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:30 am

I vote that a "U" is the female version of a "Q".

That is all.

-Rog
User avatar
Feud
level5
level5
Posts: 5149
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Blackacre, VA

Postby Feud » Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:10 am

The problem I see with the population growth in option 1 is that it would imbalance the game. Let me explain:

Suppose Asia blasts Russia to pieces,and thus has their population swelled. They just spent quite a bit of effort, time, and most important, nukes, in acquiring those points. NA then attacks them, and because the Asian cities are now much larger NA requires less nukes to gain nearly the same amount of points, while meaning that Asia has significantly more points to lose.

There is therefore an inherent disadvantage to attacks in enemy cities until you are sure that no one can strike back at you. Since the game would boil down to attacking military targets, the only real points to be had would be in the last few minutes. While it is a valid and useful tactic for default games, having an entire game mode revolve around it seems boring to me.
User avatar
shinygerbil
level5
level5
Posts: 4667
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Out, finding my own food. Also, doing the shinyBonsai Manoeuvre(tm)
Contact:

Postby shinygerbil » Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:18 am

trickser wrote:Dont nitpick! Thats bad style. Offending too! ("dense" pffff)
Welcome to the xander. ;)
Here is my signature. Make of it what you will.
Image
User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

Postby trickser » Fri Mar 07, 2008 6:26 pm

Feud wrote:There is therefore an inherent disadvantage to attacks in enemy cities until you are sure that no one can strike back at you. Since the game would boil down to attacking military targets, the only real points to be had would be in the last few minutes. While it is a valid and useful tactic for default games, having an entire game mode revolve around it seems boring to me.


a most likely szenario

it applies to the 2nd option aswell. The population grows exponential. since it just grows the points your enemy can get and you can loose, its probably a bad idea.
If your score rises with ur total population, early attacking would give you highest benefit of exponential grow rate.
User avatar
All American Mobster
level4
level4
Posts: 751
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:46 pm
Location: Upland, CA
Contact:

Postby All American Mobster » Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:16 pm

xander wrote:Welcome to the boards.

xander


Hmmm, Im glad we're all wecomed in a happy and pleasing way to this thing you call... "internet"



-$tanley

Return to “Think Tank”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests