I'm not trying to be hostile.
Frankly, this debate has reached such a degree of semantics that it might as well be a debate over legal diction. I am not here to defend Taedal in any way, nor am I implying that his error is indicative of my own or the numerous others who are also suffering from authentication; I was merely misquoted earlier by another poster as having the same issues as his, which is not the case.
Secondly, your comments here have been far less than productive. I am not actively seeking means of criticising you, but I would like to point out that this entire scuffle between us originated when you misquoted me and I defended myself in pointing out the fact that my prior words had been taken out of context. It is you who has continually responded to this thread- seemingly for the purpose of the prolonging this argument through the manipulation of quotes, and so I ask who is on this "high horse"? Do you intend to continue this argument indefinitly until you feel satisfied at having the final word?
I responded to this thread for the purpose of helping someone, yet you have insisted upon hijacking for the purpose of expressing your support for Introversion Software? We who suffer from these authentication issues have a right to be frustrated towards Introversion Software, I do not feel it is your place to quote me as being incorrect in my interpretation of the error (Et. ala your initial misquoting of myself).
Please do not respond to this thread unless you intend to positively contribute to the resolving of the authentication issue, and can do so without further criticising those who are afflicted by it.





