Naval battle is over... best defense tactics.

[tllotpfkamvpe]

.

[rus|Mike]

Nightwatch, upgrade your NA vs RU tactics already. If you're Russia and place how you advertise and I do my standart placement (~1/4 In the Atlantic to guard the passage and recon west of your territory and ~3/4 with all subs in the Pacific), you're fucked no matter what you do. Your Pacific attack with our forces being 1:1 and me having airbases with 20 bombers and 24 fighters with unlimited source of them is a suicide.

After you get slained in the Pacific, you'll find yourself with all your subs being with 0 coverage (screwed), several ships in the Atlantic with forces being 1:1 there (=can't attack) and my giant refilled fleet aproaching either from East above Siberia or to the Indian spot (there's always Atlantic variant for bor lovers). Good luck

[Nightwatch]

Nightwatch your defcon tactics are not the best, using kind words. I think you are confusing 6 player tactics with 1v1. However they are not bad for the avergae defcon player.

Oy my. You want to know how many 6 player games i played in the last three month or something? Exactly one (which i lost).
Instead of that i played dozens of 1v1 this month alone and i managed to win most of them.
And there is Mors Master Challenge where i`m second right now (sure Mike and Ace are not playing anymore).
So forgive me but i don`t give a shit about your opinion of my defcon tactics. I know what works and what doesn`t.

Nightwatch, upgrade your NA vs RU tactics already. If you're Russia and place how you advertise and I do my standart placement (~1/4 In the Atlantic to guard the passage and recon west of your territory and ~3/4 with all subs in the Pacific), you're fucked no matter what you do. Your Pacific attack with our forces being 1:1 and me having airbases with 20 bombers and 24 fighters with unlimited source of them is a suicide.

It`s about the AVERAGe Defcon Player, damnit. The AVERAGE Defcon player doesn`t deploy 3/4 of his fleet in the pacific. Or maybe he does but i don`t care since i beat him in the naval battle anyway.
I`m NOT talking about YOU, MOR or ACE. Got that?
Thanks.
So, if i would play against you i surely wouldn`t attack in the pacific. Cause i know thats the classical way for Russia in that setup.
But i`m not playing against you, torq is not playing against you.
It`s about the AVERAGE Defcon player.
And i surely don`t say what i would do facing one of the above in that setup.

After you get slained in the Pacific,

Little confident in your naval skills, aren`t you?
In the hypothetical scenario that i would attak in the pacific facing you i too have 3/4 of my fleet, all subs and two airbases in Kamchatka.
Which means, with a bit of luck i can at lest get a decent draw in the pacific.
Cause you know, i`m not the average around here.
Sure, i would propably lose against you anyway, but who doesn`t.

[tllotpfkamvpe]

.

[Nightwatch]

I don`t think you`re qualified to make such an assessment.

[sfericz]

I don`t think you`re qualified to make such an assessment.

Who qualifies who around here?
/me waits in line...

[Nightwatch]

I don`t care who does what as long as i won`t be qualified by mvpe.