Need some help with figuring something out

Anything and Everything about Uplink

Moderators: bert_the_turtle, jelco, Chris, Icepick, Rkiver

ReflectingGod
level5
level5
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 4:40 pm
Location: W. Australia

Postby ReflectingGod » Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:23 am

Stupid talk aside, I am inclined to agree with Smeggy, it's theoretically possible to travel above the speed of light, but it's not possible to accelerate a massive object through the speed of light.

And also, what Stew's says is correct, confusing this relativity stuff, isn't it. :?
ME!

Procrastination - Hard work often pays of after time, but laziness always pays off now!

**Bibo ergo sum!**
Stewsburntmonkey
level5
level5
Posts: 11553
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 7:44 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Postby Stewsburntmonkey » Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:18 am

An issue when you start discussing faster than light travel is that matter moving faster than the speed of light will appear to some observers to be moving backward through time. This would mean it would be theoretically possible for someone to go back in time and kill his father or grandfather. However there is a paradox in killing your father or grandfather before they had a chance to produce offspring. If your grandfather is killed before he has offspring neither your father nor you should exist.

Further since speed is relative to the observer if I spin around in circles the moon, sun and stars all appear to orbit me rapidly. In fact the speed at which they orbit me (given their distance from me) is faster than the speed of light.

It should also be pointed out that this faster than light thing is only true in a vaccum. In water or even air matter can travel faster than light, because air and water both reduce the speed of light significantly.
Dezmond
level4
level4
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 6:21 pm

Postby Dezmond » Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:31 pm

Speed of light in vacuum: 3x10^8 m/s
Speed of light in fibre-optic cables: 2x10^8 m/s
...

I could go on forever... Stew's last point is correct. General relativity refers to the speed of light in a vacuum, rather than another material.

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest