Postby zarrrt » Thu May 01, 2014 10:27 am
Allowing bank loans could enable you to stay afloat whilst you 'turn around' your prison. If you have had a major fire for example this could be a valid reason to take out a large loan and spend some time in negative income. If in the long term you can repair the damage etc then you could pay off the loan and the debt... So 5hifty, in theory your argument is valid, but these circumstances are rare.
However, in most circumstances when our prisons end up in both debt (bank loans) and having a negative income loans do not provide a solution. Given the rate of interest it is difficult to see how you could make more money. Usually debt is caused by too many staff (overheads) and a lack of prisoners. A bank loan neither brings in more prisoners nor provides a long term solution to excessive overheads. Thus counting a bank loan as cash would merely extend the number of days before you went bankrupt. So Barrow I agree with statement.
Ultimately we can count or not count the load as valid cash, perhaps the value of your prison and its degree of success could influence if you go bankrupt. After all creditors frequently allow businesses that are in debt to continue trading because they are successful and can be turned around. In PA you would need at least a few days (PA time) to successfully turn around a prison as your would need to either have many more prisoners or redesign large parts of the prison so it works effectively with fewer staff.
Orangewarning... Yes the system needs tweaking, with loans, grants, higher prisoner allowances and share issues I can't see how you could go bust...