Corporate brand building

The only place you'll ever hear the truth
User avatar
ewanm
level3
level3
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:15 pm
Location: ::1
Contact:

Postby ewanm » Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:32 pm

Well, at 19 I play tetris :P and trek, a few MUD's, nethack...
User avatar
xander
level5
level5
Posts: 16869
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Highland, CA, USA
Contact:

Postby xander » Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:45 am

ewanm wrote:Well, at 19 I play tetris :P and trek, a few MUD's, nethack...

Tetris will never grow old. I will be playing Tetris until I die!

xander
User avatar
NeoThermic
Introversion Staff
Introversion Staff
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 10:55 am
Location: ::1
Contact:

Postby NeoThermic » Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:56 am

xander wrote:
ewanm wrote:Well, at 19 I play tetris :P and trek, a few MUD's, nethack...

Tetris will never grow old. I will be playing Tetris until I die!

xander


And even then, I'll be re-organising the other coffins to make complete lines so we can all go into the afterlife!

NeoThermic
Crazy George
level0
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:07 am
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:

Postby Crazy George » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:17 am

Regarding COD 4 I'm sorry but a single player campaign that lasted for 6 hours and 45 minutes is not what I call 'classic'. The vast majority of classic games had a very strong single player element regardless of genre. Six hours and 45 minutes, that's more or less 10 euros/pounds per hour if you think of it. Sure, it was a very very good game but suffers from lack of content.

As for Bioshock, well it was full of gimmickry. Besides the opening cutscene and a few short instances, it was impossible to realize that the plot takes place underwater. Add to that the Doom 3 gimmickry where your field of view is very limited since 95% of the screen is dark.

Distinct lack of ammunition forced the player to use various 'spells', the only innovative gameplay element. Add to that the erratic enemy movement and there you have it. Frustrating to the core. On top of that, the plot is supposed to take place in the 60's. Well, the overall artistic approach fits more the 30's so it's another miss. If you strip down Bioshock from the hype, it's more or less a re-make of System Shock taking advantage of strides in hardware technology. Nothing more, nothing less. Not an unplayable game but not a great one either.
User avatar
Pox
level5
level5
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby Pox » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:56 am

Crazy George: Rapture was built in the forties, so the art-deco style is actually quite appropriate.

My opinions on Bioshock were mixed... creatively, I think it was one of the best games ever - the art, sound and storyline were some of the best (if not the best) I've seen in any game to date... and I don't see what the qualms are about not seeing the water enough, it is a city, not a waterpark...
However, as a game, I didn't enjoy it much: it felt like a dumbed-down console FPS with spells. A real shame.
User avatar
Phelanpt
level5
level5
Posts: 1837
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:20 am
Location: Portugal

Postby Phelanpt » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:18 am

xander wrote:I would hope that Shadow of the Colossus and Tetris are on that list.

Isn't Tetris already on the list? If you consider the amount of clones, variations, and handheld tetris machines there are, I'd assume it already is.

As for Shadow of the Colossus, I'd also hope it is. I fell in love with it on a friend's PS2, and I'll probably buy one for me just for that game. :D (and also to try Ico :P)
User avatar
KingAl
level5
level5
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:42 am

Re: The gaming industry as it is today...

Postby KingAl » Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:55 am

Crazy George wrote:Regarding COD 4 I'm sorry but a single player campaign that lasted for 6 hours and 45 minutes is not what I call 'classic'. The vast majority of classic games had a very strong single player element regardless of genre. Six hours and 45 minutes, that's more or less 10 euros/pounds per hour if you think of it. Sure, it was a very very good game but suffers from lack of content.

As for Bioshock, well it was full of gimmickry. Besides the opening cutscene and a few short instances, it was impossible to realize that the plot takes place underwater. Add to that the Doom 3 gimmickry where your field of view is very limited since 95% of the screen is dark.

Distinct lack of ammunition forced the player to use various 'spells', the only innovative gameplay element. Add to that the erratic enemy movement and there you have it. Frustrating to the core. On top of that, the plot is supposed to take place in the 60's. Well, the overall artistic approach fits more the 30's so it's another miss. If you strip down Bioshock from the hype, it's more or less a re-make of System Shock taking advantage of strides in hardware technology. Nothing more, nothing less. Not an unplayable game but not a great one either.

I bought Disraeli Gears for $35 the other day. That's, like, $35 per hour. It must have no redeeming features by virtue of that fact, and indeed cannot be termed a classic as a result.
Regarding Bioshock, what you call 'gimmickry' is what others call 'atmosphere', and is indeed irrelevant if you're taking a purely pragmatic perspective, which would be a stupid perspective to take - though moaning about the 'variety of weapons' doesn't exactly suggest an enthusiasm to think otherwise. Aspects of gameplay which you criticise such as the paucity of ammunition and the "whack-a-mole AI" perform a similar atmospheric task. What you're doing is criticising the game's premise, rather than flaws in its realisation. Similarly, I disliked 1984 because it deviated too far from the mould that the Oxford English Dictionary had already set. There certainly are flaws in its realisation, by the way, such as death without penalty (though I believe they've now released a patch to allow that particular oddity to be disabled). I also like how you criticise it for retreading System Shock yet accuse it of aping Resident Evil in its central design - have you played the former, and if so did the obvious intent of homage displayed in the title of this game clue you in to the fact that, like its predecessors, you may not enjoy it?

That said, BioShock to me felt quite clumsy; I would've liked to have liked it as much as shiny. Perhaps I'll try re-playing it with the new patch.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here: this is the War Room!
Ultimate Uplink Guide
Latest Patch
User avatar
Xocrates
level5
level5
Posts: 5262
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:34 pm

Postby Xocrates » Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:11 am

Crazy George wrote:Regarding COD 4 I'm sorry but a single player campaign that lasted for 6 hours and 45 minutes is not what I call 'classic'. The vast majority of classic games had a very strong single player element regardless of genre. Six hours and 45 minutes, that's more or less 10 euros/pounds per hour if you think of it. Sure, it was a very very good game but suffers from lack of content.


I can finish Portal in about 1 hour, that makes it about 20€/hour and I still found it one of the best games I played in recent times and will be surprised if it does not turn into a modern classic.

Similarly, I finished Max Payne 2 in less than 6 hours and consider it one of the best third person games I've played.

Heck, my favourite games for my Sega megadrive/genesis and Saturn can be finished in about one hour.

Lenght is not a measure for classic. Even more so because that invalidates multiplayer games as classics.
User avatar
Nutter
level3
level3
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Postby Nutter » Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:54 am

I do think a lot of console games these days are paint by numbers, though there are ones that occasionally break this and brings something new to the table. Downloadable games for ps3 and xbox 360 are often more interesting than their full fledged game brothers. Of course there are a lot of crap there too (is three different versions of pac man really required on xbox live and god knows how many tetris variations?) but because of ps3 and xbox 360 it seems theres more attention on indie/smaller games that try something different, and now they are able hit more people than those just on pc who knows where to look for these hidden gems.

So not everything is bad with consoles :wink:
User avatar
Cooper42
level4
level4
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:04 pm

Postby Cooper42 » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:03 pm

shinygerbil wrote:Bioshock is also the perfect example of what you are talking about. Innovativity and creativity are two very different things, and both have their place; no game necessarily needs both. Bioshock was creative, which made it different; it was not innovative, but nonetheless I have never played anything quite like it.
I liked Bioshock. It looked very purty and was well written. But as a game, it left me wanting. Especially as I spent the first few hours being reminded of SS2 game mechanics and how novel they seemed at the time, and how they now seem a bit clunky, as well as watered-down. Ken Levine's movie background was very obvious in that game.

The games industry has matured quickly I think, and has too many parallels to the movie industry for comfort. I hate having the mediums compared, as that tends to belie the potentiallity of games as interactive and so very different from what we expect. Because the industry at large mimics the movie industry, you either go your own way and do what you want, and you'll never, ever get the funding required for Bioshock-esque pretty. Or you get a publishing deal, and they pour millions into the purty at the expense of anything really new / novel / different. I've always been a fan of novelty for the sake of novelty.

Valve, as a company, seem to suggest a way out of that, by keeping those who love games at the heart of the game making process.
Whoever you vote for, the government wins.
RabidZombie
level5
level5
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:09 pm

Postby RabidZombie » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:34 pm

Xocrates wrote:
Crazy George wrote:Regarding COD 4 I'm sorry but a single player campaign that lasted for 6 hours and 45 minutes is not what I call 'classic'. The vast majority of classic games had a very strong single player element regardless of genre. Six hours and 45 minutes, that's more or less 10 euros/pounds per hour if you think of it. Sure, it was a very very good game but suffers from lack of content.


I can finish Portal in about 1 hour, that makes it about 20€/hour and I still found it one of the best games I played in recent times and will be surprised if it does not turn into a modern classic.

Similarly, I finished Max Payne 2 in less than 6 hours and consider it one of the best third person games I've played.

Heck, my favourite games for my Sega megadrive/genesis and Saturn can be finished in about one hour.

Lenght is not a measure for classic. Even more so because that invalidates multiplayer games as classics.


You FOOL! Why did you not purchase it as part of the Orange Box!?

As for COD4, I'd say the Multiplayer was well worth what I payed for it (which was less than £60 might I add).
User avatar
Xocrates
level5
level5
Posts: 5262
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:34 pm

Postby Xocrates » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:54 pm

RabidZombie wrote:You FOOL! Why did you not purchase it as part of the Orange Box!?


I regret NOTHING!
User avatar
xander
level5
level5
Posts: 16869
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Highland, CA, USA
Contact:

Postby xander » Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:46 pm

Phelanpt wrote:
xander wrote:I would hope that Shadow of the Colossus and Tetris are on that list.

Isn't Tetris already on the list? If you consider the amount of clones, variations, and handheld tetris machines there are, I'd assume it already is.

As for Shadow of the Colossus, I'd also hope it is. I fell in love with it on a friend's PS2, and I'll probably buy one for me just for that game. :D (and also to try Ico :P)

The only reason I bought Shadow was because Ico was so damn good. ;)

xander
ChristopherS
level0
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 10:02 pm

Postby ChristopherS » Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:14 pm

I love hearing about the inside workings of games companies, and the decisions that people make along the way


As a member of a german hobby gamedev team (http://www.sechsta-sinn.com) I enjoy reading your posts a lot, so please keep on posting :)

Return to “Introversion Blog”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests