It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.

ChasM · Postby **ChasM** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:24 am

Uhh, I thought you knew this stuff:
http://forums.introversion.co.uk/darwin ... um.php?f=9

xander · Postby **xander** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:46 am

Montyphy wrote:hows that?

Granted, the last version of Linux I used was YellowDog something or another, and a 2.2.x kernel, but, as I recall, "shutdown -h now" halts the system, immediately. -r would cause the system to reboot, and changing "now" to some other value, such as a number, it would take that many seconds before the system shutdown.

xander

Montyphy · Postby **Montyphy** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:54 am

xander wrote:
Montyphy wrote:hows that?

Granted, the last version of Linux I used was YellowDog something or another, and a 2.2.x kernel, but, as I recall, "shutdown -h now" halts the system, immediately. -r would cause the system to reboot, and changing "now" to some other value, such as a number, it would take that many seconds before the system shutdown.

xander

And -k apparently kicks all users but root then disables them from logging back in.

ChasM · Postby **ChasM** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:28 am

From my SuSE 9.0 manual:

-k Don't really shutdown; only send the warning
messages to everybody.

So actually, then prophile disables them from logging back in.

Rkiver · Postby **Rkiver** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:40 am

ChasM wrote:From my SuSE 9.0 manual:

-k Don't really shutdown; only send the warning
messages to everybody.

So actually, then prophile disables them from logging back in.

That's in the SuSE 9.2 one also, at least I think it is. I need to get my copy of that out.

Montyphy · Postby **Montyphy** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:48 am

Mac OS X must use a different version/implementation of shutdown then.

xander · Postby **xander** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:44 pm

Montyphy wrote:Mac OS X must use a different version/implementation of shutdown then.

Yup, it does.

xander

Xandor · Postby **Xandor** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:30 am

"Think Different"

Soon the Mac OS X will be more common on Intel hardware, then my multi-boot PC will have 5 to choose from.

xander

Xocrates · Postby **Xocrates** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:34 am

Xandor???

I don't even want to know!

xander · Postby **xander** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:46 am

I have been cloned! Oh, and: hi, prophile!

xander

Xandor · Postby **Xandor** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:53 am

Dave? Dave's not here man. . .

KingAl · Postby **KingAl** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:09 am

Shouldn't you have a humorously derisive profile, Xandor?

Xandor · Postby **Xandor** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:45 am

[Cleaned]
You should be more careful next time...
and I'll be more derisive. Any suggestions?
What NO derision?

Postby **NeoThermic** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:03 am

For someone who's supposed to be in Sparks, NV, you're doing a good job of actually existing in Phoenix, AZ...

NeoThermic

MoonHill · Postby **MoonHill** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:13 am

NeoThermic wrote:For someone who's supposed to be in Sparks, NV, you're doing a good job of actually existing in Phoenix, AZ...

NeoThermic

OMGSUPERADMINPWNINGPOWERS!

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.

shutdown -h now

Shutdown -h now

Re: Shutdown -h now

Nevada is nicer than you think.

Who is online