Page 4 of 15

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:43 pm
by rus|Mike
I don't see the difference between lowest estimate I've seen (80 warheads) and highest (400).

Both ways they have more than enough to send Iran back to 10th century (from their current 18th century state) if something goes wrong and to make any state forget about trying to protect Iran with military force.

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:58 pm
by The Mighty Santa
Yeah, in fact, I think even 30 would be enough to devastate Iran, Tehran, Qom, Isfahan, etc all gone...

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:30 am
by Forever Young
yeah, 80 warheads is pretty much. but if you have to fight more than 1 country you will need more. also you need different warhead types. for subs, fighters, missiles, tactical weapons, small and big nuclear bombs ,neutron bombs, EMP, salted bombs, ... . also it is possible that the enemy will shoot down a few nukes, like in defcon!
Iranian official: We'll act if US stupidly attacks Syria':!
edit:Stennis leaves for the Mid East 4 months earlier!
edit: my bet, the strike will start in October!

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:30 pm
by Laika
"US to Iran: In case of Israeli strike, don’t fire on our bases" ... our-bases/

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:17 pm
by Forever Young
yeah, but the US military and other West Nations will defend Israel against Iran nukes. what will happen then?
also, it is clear that the USA and Israel will prevent Iran from nuclear bombs. only differences is the striking time.
The US goverment want to wait till spring 2013 and Israel would like to fight before the US elections.

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:25 pm
by rus|Mike
Forever Young wrote:The US goverment will wait till spring 2013 and Israel will fight now before the US elections.


Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:13 am
by Forever Young running out for non-military pressure on Iran could strike US bases if attacked
edit: set to unveil homegrown medium-range cruise missile could send Iran ‘back to the stone age’ with electromagnetic bomb

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:14 am
by infoleather
"Correct" move for a given policy objectives may be another wrong move. Your question is ambiguous. After knowing these types of Vintage leather satchel bags for men, you may know which type is the most appropriate bag for you. If you are going to purchase a Leather double handle briefcase and it is important to search for some information of the bag.

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:29 pm
by Forever Young
infoleather wrote:"Correct" move for a given policy objectives may be another wrong move. Your question is ambiguous.

I do not understand what you mean!Spambot?

i want to say something more about the Iranian nuclear problem.
Iran has a right to be a nuclear power country, normally, but you cannot want to have nuclear power and say at the same time we want to delete Israel from the map.
What would happen if an other country would say we want to delete the USA or Russia from the map. It is simple.
Also Iran`s leader is a religious leader. He gives public instructions for terror attacks in order.
The Iranian country is a very proud nation. they will never stop the nuclear power. i see no peaceful solution.
i still think the Israelis will strike this year. if not they will strike next year together with many West Nations.
it will be never a 30 day war. we will see a war over many years. some people are saying it will be a generations war.

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:25 pm
by Ace Rimmer
Sydney Morning Herald, today wrote:WASHINGTON: Iran's most senior atomic energy official has revealed that separate explosions, which he attributed to sabotage, had targeted power supplies to the country's two main uranium enrichment facilities, including the deep underground site that US and Israeli officials say is the most protected against bombing.

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:35 pm
by Forever Young
Explosives used to cut power to Fordow plant last month, Iranian nuke chief claims; says "terrorists" have infiltrated IAEA.
lol!terrorists! :roll:

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:44 pm
by Forever Young
Mofaz: Israel will not attack Iran in coming year!

Iran pours more troops into Syria, ready to target Israel from Syria and Lebanon

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:11 pm
by Laika
Keep posting.

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:37 pm
by Forever Young
:lol: what do you mean? i should post more links or i should stop it?

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:45 pm
by Ace Rimmer
Israel will not attack Iran in the coming year.

That could be taken as "because they'll do it before then", depending on how you define "the coming year". :P