Jelco's TWG: Game over: Wolves win!

The place to hang out and talk about totally anything general.
User avatar
trickser
level5
level5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: The Senate ; GMT+1
Contact:

Postby trickser » Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:15 pm

Oh well, noone is moving.

Xander is suspicious to me for very same reason as on day 1. But maybe its just how he plays.

I [not] vote for shinygerbil, for no special reason but intuition.
Last edited by trickser on Sat Jan 14, 2012 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Xocrates
level5
level5
Posts: 5262
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:34 pm

Postby Xocrates » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:13 pm

I'm moving my vote to Phelanpt. Reading back, he seems to be trying to act low key and doing what could be perceived as either safe or manipulative votes.
Mas Tnega
level5
level5
Posts: 7898
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Postby Mas Tnega » Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:13 pm

This isn't going anywhere. Of the two I was tending towards, I choose Phelanpt.
User avatar
MrBunsy
level5
level5
Posts: 1081
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Southampton
Contact:

Postby MrBunsy » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:32 pm

Got till tomorrow so might wait till I vote, but I'm also puzzled as to why jordy was munched.
User avatar
zjoere
level5
level5
Posts: 1623
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby zjoere » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:42 pm

I'll put in a vote for xander for the moment. He was part of the Jordy bandwagon and now is trying to deflect guilt on other bandwagon members.

edit: vote retracted.
Last edited by zjoere on Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
You're so vain, you probably think this sig is about you
DTNC Vicious
Site Admin
Posts: 1783
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
Location: North of the Wall
Contact:

Postby DTNC Vicious » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:52 pm

zjoere wrote:I'll put in a vote for Xander for the moment. He was part of the Jordy bandwagon and now is trying to deflect guilt on other bandwagon members.



Very Good Point! Trying to put it all on me for jumping on last, so my vote is Xander
-Vic
User avatar
Phelanpt
level5
level5
Posts: 1837
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:20 am
Location: Portugal

Postby Phelanpt » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:58 pm

zjoere has a point about Seitaro, one I didn't consider at the time. My vote was an attempt to make him talk, but if he doesn't talk he'll end up dead too... I don't have any big suspicions so far, though, so not changing it yet.
User avatar
Phelanpt
level5
level5
Posts: 1837
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:20 am
Location: Portugal

Postby Phelanpt » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:10 pm

zjoere wrote: Microchips is the more suspicious one of the non-voters imo since he was active but decided not to vote. Maybe he didn't want to draw any attention? But then again it's also a possibility he just forgot to vote.
He told me on IRC that had he known it was a tie, he would have voted. Don't know what to make of that.
Mas Tnega
level5
level5
Posts: 7898
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Postby Mas Tnega » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:12 pm

I make of it that he couldn't be arsed.

Just like make of Vicious' posts that he can't be arsed doing something better than 'me-too'ing.
DTNC Vicious
Site Admin
Posts: 1783
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
Location: North of the Wall
Contact:

Postby DTNC Vicious » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:08 pm

Wrong, he just made a good point and i agree........My first vote against Jordy was just hopping on yes, but my last vote has reason.
-Vic
User avatar
Phelanpt
level5
level5
Posts: 1837
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:20 am
Location: Portugal

Postby Phelanpt » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:14 pm

You don't seem to be giving any reasons of your own, just jumping on reasons others have given. How is Mas wrong?
DTNC Vicious
Site Admin
Posts: 1783
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
Location: North of the Wall
Contact:

Postby DTNC Vicious » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:30 pm

how did i not make a reason on my last vote, it seems Xander was trying to call me out because i was the last to vote Jordy, maybe to cover his tracksup i don't know, but just seems fishy.
-Vic
User avatar
ynbniar
level5
level5
Posts: 2028
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Home again...

Postby ynbniar » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:45 pm

Lynch shinygerbil

shinygerbil wrote:Well I am genuinely surprised...


I find this wording strange...why are you not just surprised, why the adjective?

1. shinygerbil told us on day 1 that if he was a wolf he would want to keep jordy around
2. jordy gets eaten
3. shinygerbil now appears human because he wouldn't have eaten jordy.

Looks like a cunning ruse to me :!:
microchip08
level5
level5
Posts: 1186
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:37 pm
Contact:

Postby microchip08 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:55 pm

Seitaro, because his inactivity is making me apprehensive. I'm also worried about Phelanpt, but four-way As you guys don't seem to like it if people bandwagon, ties are, at least at this point in Morning 2, more beneficial than me breaking the tie (so that the wolves are more likely to act to save one of their number [as it's more likely with a three-way tie that one of them is lupine than a two-way tie {and as such more likely with a four way tie <and I've run out of brackets>}]).

Hopefully I make sense.
By my count, it's now Seitaro / shinygerbil / xander / phelanpt, two votes each.

Edit 4:09PM UTC 14 Jan: Retracted vote.
Last edited by microchip08 on Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
shinygerbil
level5
level5
Posts: 4667
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Out, finding my own food. Also, doing the shinyBonsai Manoeuvre(tm)
Contact:

Postby shinygerbil » Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:11 am

ynbniar wrote:Lynch shinygerbil

shinygerbil wrote:Well I am genuinely surprised...


I find this wording strange...why are you not just surprised, why the adjective?

1. shinygerbil told us on day 1 that if he was a wolf he would want to keep jordy around
2. jordy gets eaten
3. shinygerbil now appears human because he wouldn't have eaten jordy.

Looks like a cunning ruse to me :!:


Well, it wouldn't really be that cunning, now would it?

1. Person A makes a general statement about what wolves might do
2. Wolves do the opposite deliberately
3. Person A now appears human
4. Wolves point this "alibi" out, thus attempting to get Person A lynched

Unsurprisingly I feel a little bit like Person A right now.

ynbniar, you've been nitpicking my posts since Day 1. If I find myself in need of voting someone else to save my ass, then I will have to put my vote where it counts. Otherwise I'll certainly be voting for you.

For now I'm happy to leave the four way tie, to see if the others start to sweat.

Return to “Introversion Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests