
652 in a 3v3
Moderator: Defcon moderators
-
DTNC Vicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
- Location: North of the Wall
- Contact:
- tllotpfkamvpe
- level5

- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:04 am
Re: 652 in a 3v3
Vicious wrote:i think i did pretty good
You lost. Is that really any good?
-
DTNC Vicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
- Location: North of the Wall
- Contact:
Re: 652 in a 3v3
rus|Mike wrote:Vicious wrote:i think i did pretty good
You lost. Is that really any good?
Thats y i said I did Pretty Good, not my team did pretty good
-Vic
Well, your team may have lost because you were more focused on getting points, than defeating the enemy.
You also seem to forget that you were playing with 200mill points per territory. So on a normal board, your score would be less than half of 652. It's much easier to get high scores with double the pop.
You also seem to forget that you were playing with 200mill points per territory. So on a normal board, your score would be less than half of 652. It's much easier to get high scores with double the pop.
-
DTNC Vicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:48 am
- Location: North of the Wall
- Contact:
Why? wrote:Well, your team may have lost because you were more focused on getting points, than defeating the enemy.
You also seem to forget that you were playing with 200mill points per territory. So on a normal board, your score would be less than half of 652. It's much easier to get high scores with double the pop.
Well i was defeating the enmy by myself, if u see 1 of my teamates as no kills at 150 million deaths, so i wasnt working with the greatest people to start off with
-Vic
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


