I have .1 higher than him in score, check the screen. On my comp it said I win but RuslMike has a screenshot where it said HE won (waiting on his reply to post a screenie)
Although he's too much of an egomaniac to admit a tie, I'll leave it to you guys to decide who won xD
Successes
-I only lost one sub (with 2 nukes left) to his naval nuking and was able to fire 11 full subs into Russia.
-Scouting early and wiping out two silos and 2 airbases
-very successful bomber attacks
Fatal Errors
- allowing RuslMike's offense to go with barely any opposition
- not reverting back to defense therefor losing two nearly empty silos (which could've been prevented)
THE biggest error for RuslMike:
-There was a small radar near Kinsasha which he neglected when oepning his subs initially. A few extra nukes could've won him the game without dispute but because I saw them I was able to counter with airbase fighters.
let him fill in the gaps, I don't have his eyes
It was a pretty straightforward game with lots of destruction. I put my full navy save one carrier and 6 battleships in the Indian Ocean. RuslMike obviously went 100 percent Atlantic. So the naval battle didn't exactly occur until the very end when it didn't exactly make any difference. Though that's the explanation for why there're so few ships in that screenshot.
it's not a ladder or tournament match, so what the discussion is about? I personally don't care about numeric result, all I learned from this game is that my new strategy works perfectly and that PnL couldn't surely defeat me even in one of top 3 most lucky match-ups. That's all. PnL, if you want to be winner, than be a winner, I'm not against.
as I recall it. That's the only reason I brought up this discussion lol