North vs. South...The End?

Post match discussion - talk about your recent victories and losses here

Moderator: Defcon moderators

User avatar
Church
level2
level2
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:56 am
Location: Silo 3

North vs. South...The End?

Postby Church » Fri May 18, 2007 7:26 pm

Would've gotten this up sooner but imageshack was being a pin to get the screenie uploaded.

This was a 3v3 game I'd played allied with JESUS and Weps against Rising Thunder, shoulders and UPU. Max pop, max cities with equalized pops.

I was Africa, JESUS was SA, and Weps was Asia. Rising Thunder was NA, shoulders was Europe, and UPU was Russia. A true North vs. South battle.

Defcon 5

Weps set up his silos in the Middle East (southern Saudi/Yemen/UAE area). On his advice I set my silos on the eastern edge of Africa next to his with my airbases surrounding them. I deployed most of my naval forces in the mid-Atlantic (up by the Ivory Coast) except for 3 battleships and 3 subs. I ultimately moved the battleships to join their comrades in the Atlantic (I'd placed them before seeing Weps' suggestion that my fleet should go in the Atlantic), but I kept my three subs in the Indian. Weps' navy set up shop in the Indian, and JESUS set up just off the Brazilian coast not far from my BBs. The remaining subs I set up in the North Atlantic. I sent three towards Canada, another two near Cuba, and another two in ine middle of the Atlantic across from the U.S. Eastern Seaboard.

Defcon 4

Didn't detect much of the enemy at this point. Two European silos and one Russian silo were detected by radars immediately, along with some radars. I also spotted a group of four Euro BBs skirting along the eastern African coast a little ways south of Gibraltar.

Defcon 3

I started launching some bombers to deal with the naval forces prowling along my eastern coast. I also sent fighters up north to see if I could find anything else. NA subs started pinging mine near Cuba and I started pinging backI think I killed a couple of his subs at the expense of a couple of mine.

Defcon 2

Commenced bomber launches in preparation for a strike at the visible Euro assets. I ultimately was able to slip three subs into the area between Canada and Greenland, and had three BBs join them to serve as cover. I had subs ready to launch of the U.S. east coast, and all my bombers were airborne before Defcon 1. JESUS mentioned NA's silos were in Canada to Weps and me on the Alliance channel.

Defcon 1

Subs appeared off my eastern coast preparing to launch. I diverted a couple of bombers to deal with them as I was sending carrier-based and land-based bombers to hit Euro silos and radars. Jesus was initiating actions against NA. Weps also sent bombers to strike at targets in Russia. He would ultimately send some towards Europe to find the remaining silos. Two of my bombers also found two more European silos and more radar. Weps and I together got all six Euro silos and I think he got all the Russian ones as well.

NA started launching silos, from Canada where JESUS thought they were. I started launching my subs off NA (at cities at first, then switched targets when JESUS reminded me to go for the silos. NA did send a nuke at my subs off Greenland and got them but I'd gotten some nukes away. I think I'd brought down a couple of his silos, and JESUS mowed down the rest. All this while I was still launching bombers at European and Russian cities.

A little while later Weps mentioned he was going to get some points, and I decided to join his bomber and silo attack with silo launches of my own. JESUS also launched liberally at NA. I also put in flight my remaining nuke-loaded bombers to get whatever points I could. By the time it was all said and done, I'd gutted Europe, some of Russia, and Weps also worked over Europe and Russia. JESUS and I also turned NA into a smoldering ruin. All in all, it ended up a pretty one-sided affair. Weps did get hit pretty hard in the whole thing mostly from Russia and Europe, but JESUS and I didn't do too bad as far as casualties went.

Image

South 1-0 North, and I ended up with a personal record for a default-scoring game (357 points)

Take Care

-Church
Rising Thunder MVP
level2
level2
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 2:03 pm

Postby Rising Thunder MVP » Fri May 18, 2007 7:39 pm

im sick of reading these biased and incorrect game reports. The accurate description of the game would be as follows:
church went for a lot of cities and greedly earned himself a lot of points being in fear of a humiliating loss and got away with it due to my connection drop straight after defcon 3, where i had to restart my game. Upon returning i thanked the cpu for ruining my almost fully coorinated attack and one chance of defeating sa with na. I stayed to watch me and allies get well and truly beat and finished the match like a true mvp.
User avatar
xander
level5
level5
Posts: 16869
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Highland, CA, USA
Contact:

Postby xander » Fri May 18, 2007 7:49 pm

Rising Thunder MVP wrote:im sick of reading these biased and incorrect game reports. The accurate description of the game would be as follows:
church went for a lot of cities and greedly earned himself a lot of points being in fear of a humiliating loss and got away with it due to my connection drop straight after defcon 3, where i had to restart my game. Upon returning i thanked the cpu for ruining my almost fully coorinated attack and one chance of defeating sa with na. I stayed to watch me and allies get well and truly beat and finished the match like a true mvp.

If your post was an attempt at humour, ignore all of the following.

Get over yourself. No one is preventing you from posting your own debrief. If you don't think that Church's explanation is the entire story, then fill in the gaps. He was not personally attacking you, and was not trying to demean you or your team in any way. As far as I can tell, the language of the post is written fairly neutrally. Of course, Church can only post the game as he saw it, and is liable to leave out details that you might think are important, but there was no attempt to defame you here. Just relax a little, okay?

xander
User avatar
Deamon
level2
level2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:09 pm
Location: Éire

Postby Deamon » Fri May 18, 2007 7:50 pm

Churchs description is better imo.
Image
User avatar
Ace Rimmer
level5
level5
Posts: 10803
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: The Multiverse

Postby Ace Rimmer » Fri May 18, 2007 7:51 pm

Rising Thunder MVP wrote:im sick of reading these biased and incorrect game reports. The accurate description of the game would be as follows:
church went for a lot of cities and greedly earned himself a lot of points being in fear of a humiliating loss and got away with it due to my connection drop straight after defcon 3, where i had to restart my game. Upon returning i thanked the cpu for ruining my almost fully coordinated attack and one chance of defeating sa with na. I stayed to watch me and allies get well and truly beat and finished the match like a true mvp.

Well, it's debatable as to whether you can actually give an unbiased report. Even though you stuck around, whining about loss for whatever reason is certainly not acting like a mvp.

If Church got greedy and took advantage of a CPU replacement, I'd call that playing Defcon to win. He's had some humiliating defeats (I know cause I've seen them first hand :wink:), and never whined about it.

Lastly, who here hasn't been defeated because of connection problems and the CPU taking over?
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast...
Rising Thunder MVP
level2
level2
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 2:03 pm

Postby Rising Thunder MVP » Fri May 18, 2007 8:00 pm

ok xander thanks a lot. no im not being funny or sarcastic or anything. ok?
User avatar
ynbniar
level5
level5
Posts: 2028
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Home again...

Postby ynbniar » Fri May 18, 2007 8:13 pm

On another note, isn't this game an example of 3 vets winning a game against 3 unknowns?

I'm hope I'm not upsetting anyone here but I've heard of Church and Weps, and played against Jesus and they are extremely good players.

I haven't come across the other 3 so assume (correct me if I'm wrong) they are not as experienced as their opponents (they might be aliases I suppose).

:?:
User avatar
JESUS
level2
level2
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: naked and alone in the dark

Postby JESUS » Fri May 18, 2007 8:19 pm

Rising Thunder MVP wrote: Upon returning i thanked the cpu for ruining my almost fully coorinated attack and one chance of defeating sa with na.


The one chance you had , was if I had connection problems :wink:

we played again after this a 2 v 2 , which again I was SA and MVP ( most vunerable primate ) was NA , and the result was the same , but a bigger whopping. hopefully church will be doing another report on this . As he was speccing it should be totally un biassed.

after saying that. MVP is a good player, and I always look forward to playing him.

If he could only cut down on the moaning :roll:
User avatar
Ace Rimmer
level5
level5
Posts: 10803
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: The Multiverse

Postby Ace Rimmer » Fri May 18, 2007 8:27 pm

ynbniar wrote:On another note, isn't this game an example of 3 vets winning a game against 3 unknowns?

I'm hope I'm not upsetting anyone here but I've heard of Church and Weps, and played against Jesus and they are extremely good players.

I haven't come across the other 3 so assume (correct me if I'm wrong) they are not as experienced as their opponents (they might be aliases I suppose).

:?:

I can safely say that JESUS and Weps are masters of the game but haven't played Church enough to make that determination. Plus, this game is stuck in my mind. It seems Church has markedly improved since then.

Perhaps Church sticking close to JESUS has given Church some divine inspiration for playing better? :lol:
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast...
User avatar
JESUS
level2
level2
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: naked and alone in the dark

Postby JESUS » Fri May 18, 2007 8:49 pm

:?:[/quote]
I can safely say that JESUS and Weps are masters of the game but haven't played Church enough to make that determination. Plus, this game is stuck in my mind. It seems Church has markedly improved since then.

Perhaps Church sticking close to JESUS has given Church some divine inspiration for playing better? :lol:[/quote]


I take that as a complement. Although I was on the shirt tails of weps for these games.

Church is definatley an improving player , and take it from me , I think he will be a serious threat to all .
Weps
level3
level3
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:25 pm

Postby Weps » Fri May 18, 2007 9:03 pm

ynbniar wrote:On another note, isn't this game an example of 3 vets winning a game against 3 unknowns?

I'm hope I'm not upsetting anyone here but I've heard of Church and Weps, and played against Jesus and they are extremely good players.

I haven't come across the other 3 so assume (correct me if I'm wrong) they are not as experienced as their opponents (they might be aliases I suppose).

:?:



It's not like anyone of us makes these reports just to brag about how good they are. I'm not (not bragging and not that good). It's just a game.

Trust me on this, after you've achieved a certain amount of experience you'll notice =default= defcon is nothing more than tic tac toe.

The game after this one I had a newbie ally and lost huge. In fact, mvp here came third if I remember correctly (and he had no allies).

You lose some, you win some, you post some.
Rising Thunder MVP
level2
level2
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 2:03 pm

Postby Rising Thunder MVP » Fri May 18, 2007 9:13 pm

Im taking xanders advice and just adding my corrections to the match reports from now.
In that last game the scores were as follows. jesus and his ally finished top 2, weps and his ally finished bottom two, while i was in the middle. np
Look forward to playing jesus again and i rate him highly. It should be good to see a match report on skynets challenge aswell.
Weps
level3
level3
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:25 pm

Postby Weps » Fri May 18, 2007 9:22 pm

The game before this game I finally found my son. I watched that game and saw him take out six Feud style placed silo's with his subs:

Image

Pretty impressive !!

Not wanting to have him (Jesus) show me how to play defcon in this game (the N vrs S) I took out 6 scattered Russian silo's with one bombrun =]

Considering Upu is a newbie and the lack of fighter cover I still think I've not managed to do that in quite some time.
User avatar
Ace Rimmer
level5
level5
Posts: 10803
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: The Multiverse

Postby Ace Rimmer » Fri May 18, 2007 9:29 pm

Weps wrote:The game before this game I finally found my son. I watched that game and saw him take out six Feud style placed silo's with his subs:

Pretty impressive !!

Not wanting to have him (Jesus) show me how to play defcon in this game (the N vrs S) I took out 6 scattered Russian silo's with one bombrun =]

Considering Upu is a newbie and the lack of fighter cover I still think I've not managed to do that in quite some time.

Wait, are you saying you're God?? (JESUS's dad)
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast...
User avatar
KingAl
level5
level5
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:42 am

Postby KingAl » Sat May 19, 2007 2:09 am

Chris is God. NeoThermic is Jesus. JESUS is just plain JESUS.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here: this is the War Room!
Ultimate Uplink Guide
Latest Patch

Return to “The Debriefing Room”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest