Calculating Nuke Damage

General discussion about Defcon

Moderator: Defcon moderators

User avatar
Sam Kennedy
level1
level1
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:33 am
Location: Newcastle

Calculating Nuke Damage

Postby Sam Kennedy » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:32 pm

I've seen various online nuke "simulators", such as HYDEsim which plot the damage which would result if a certain strength of nuke was detonated in a city.

I was wondering if anyone knows how the overpressures, thermal effects and fireball size are calculated?

Cheers :)
User avatar
bert_the_turtle
level5
level5
Posts: 4795
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:

Postby bert_the_turtle » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:00 pm

Basically, physics. You calculate what the explosion energy can do. The fireball size would be the radius of a sphere just small enough so that the energy can heat up what's in the sphere to, say, the melting point of lead. It would grow with the third root of the energy, roughly, with a prefactor you most conveniently get from past overground tests. For the overpressure, you assume the energy goes into the shockwave. A shockwave's energy dissipates with one over the distance to the center, squared, the energy density is proportional to the pressure squared, so the pressure should be proportional to the ratio of the square root of the blast energy and the distance to the center, again with a prefactor you take from tests. Temperature is essentially thermal energy density, that would be proportional to the blast energy divided by the square of the distance. Of course, with a prefactor. The prefactors are hard to predict, they depend on how the blast energy gets distributed over the different channels. And they'll still have some dependence on the blast energy; for really large blasts, a lot of the energy just gets radiated off into space.

And we only had to release enough radioactivity to give a hundred thousand people cancer to get the calibration data that now serves your amusement!
User avatar
Sam Kennedy
level1
level1
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:33 am
Location: Newcastle

Postby Sam Kennedy » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:10 pm

Thanks for that, going to keep me busy for a while :)

bert_the_turtle wrote:And we only had to release enough radioactivity to give a hundred thousand people cancer to get the calibration data that now serves your amusement!


You make it sound like I'm the one responsible :shock:
User avatar
xander
level5
level5
Posts: 16869
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Highland, CA, USA
Contact:

Postby xander » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:39 pm

Sam Kennedy wrote:
bert_the_turtle wrote:And we only had to release enough radioactivity to give a hundred thousand people cancer to get the calibration data that now serves your amusement!

You make it sound like I'm the one responsible :shock:

I, for one, blame you. :P

xander
User avatar
Sam Kennedy
level1
level1
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:33 am
Location: Newcastle

Postby Sam Kennedy » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:50 pm

I feel bad now :(
User avatar
47
level4
level4
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:59 pm

Postby 47 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:12 am

Sam Kennedy wrote:I feel bad now :(


if you feel bad then xander already won...

47

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests