RGeezy911 abusing admin privileges, please help

[Colytic]

1. John has nothing to do with your 'ambitions' for this board, as evidenced by your frustrated desire to make IV see things your way.

And they aren't seeing things at all. The thought is > this is the face of Introversion > it's not being handled well at all > mods are left to their own devices while the staff are mostly absent > if left unchecked, it's going to bite them in the ass sooner or later. You're right, John has nothing to do with my ambitions. But it's not like John is doing anything with the website either. Why can't I create some ideas for the board then?

2. In this community's nine year history, your attitude has never been shared by Introversion, nor its admins. What gives you the right, on your own, to change this?

And why is it so bad for an outsider to bring in something new to the table?

You don't have the right to create any new ideas for this community. You are not a part of it and a small-time moderator recruited for the new Prison Architect boards. Especially ideas that contradict the attitude taken by Introversion and the admins they recruited over the past nine years. Vicious sums it up:

a PM Neothermic sent me back in 09 when I was a mod "IMO you failed to realise the forums are anarchy based, and topics are not locked because they are a flamefest. The only topics I've locked that were not spam were topics that needed locking due to warez or other major infraction topics, of which there's been less than 10 in the past 9 years."

Let me put it this way, you're not the law here, and I think you're outnumbered.

[Isidore]

Geezy, you not answering to my post...Baton's past ban is an invalid argument cause it was an unfair ban as recognized by all (admins and users..exept kudayta and endless).

Anyway if you dont' want answer properly to my position please at least revoke the baton's ban e let me banned by kudayta...in honour of your logic, noone overturned by you.

I thought one of the points mentioned me not overturning anymore. Now you want me to overturn Kudayta without discussion?

[Abu Jazar]

In the opinion of Abu Jazar, there should be consensus or a large majority vote among administrators or moderators in order to carry out a ban, if the ban may have potential to spark controversy.

The same rule should apply for any significant decision regarding the DEFCON forums.

[Laika]

You don't have the right to create any new ideas for this community. You are not a part of it and a small-time moderator recruited for the new Prison Architect boards. Especially ideas that contradict the attitude taken by Introversion and the admins they recruited over the past nine years.

+1

[Isidore]

Revoke Baton's ban...you can't evade this.

[Ärstotzka]

You don't have the right to create any new ideas for this community. You are not a part of it and a small-time moderator recruited for the new Prison Architect boards. Especially ideas that contradict the attitude taken by Introversion and the admins they recruited over the past nine years.

On top of IV & the admins, also the community that is being moderated.

[DTNC Vicious]

To you know who,

[RGeezy911]

⠀

[Laika]

That's it then. I'm unstickying the thread.

[RGeezy911]

⠀

[Laika]

Of course.

[Isidore]

Geezy, It's very sad. You continue to not answer to my position..

You said that your only argument is the past baton's issues BUT I try to show you that this past is different by your idea..it's not a baton's issues but a baton/kudayta issues. If you evade it this is an Ignoratio Elenchi..

Then you won't do anything for my patent unfair ban..cause your overturn action is one of the reason of this thread. So respect your logic...no overturn kudayta and neither Vic and Laika: revoke Baton's ban and let me banned. Otherwise open my account overturning kudayta as you are still doing with Vic and Laika.

As invadent admin, I pretend you consider my position..

Revoke Baton's ban.

[Endless]

This whole thread is defcon in a nutshell. Someone comes in that you don't like, so you bash them and bash them until they can't take anymore and leave.

A lot of you have shown your true colors, for the good and the bad. The most liberal player i know (Kud) seems to be the most conservative and the most conservative player I know (Vic) seems to be the most liberal.

[DTNC Vicious]

This whole thread is defcon in a nutshell. Someone comes in that you don't like, so you bash them and bash them until they can't take anymore and leave.

A lot of you have shown your true colors, for the good and the bad. The most liberal player i know (Kud) seems to be the most conservative and the most conservative player I know (Vic) seems to be the most liberal.

I'd give my life for the nights watch * defcon community" - jon snow

[Isidore]

This is geezy answer via pm:

I already mentioned this. Baton evading his ban by creating alternative accounts is what's keeping him banned. Additionally, he continued to be insulting on one of his alternative accounts. I understand that his past issue was from moderator abuse, which is the biggest issue on this entire website. I don't know how else to answer your point.

I'm done with this community in case you didn't get my message on the topic. Talk to Laika about your ban. He seems to be giving the old timers a free pass today.

I don't want free pass, I want to go away forever from this.

Defcon is the best videogame I ever played, I hope people like you continue to play it with fun and with anarchic and sexy aptitudes..with smooth tongue and hard fingers.

Goodbye to the players that I loved and to all the guys in my anal introversion..