A new source of tactics

General discussion about Defcon

Moderator: Defcon moderators

nick.hardman
level0
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:21 pm

A new source of tactics

Postby nick.hardman » Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:30 pm

Hi guys.

A friend of mine has made a website about defcon tactics, http://www.defcon-tactics.com which has some hints and tips about the game. You can read hints, tips and other tactics, and add any of your own tactics for others to read!

I hope you guys like it!

Nick Hardman
alphager
level3
level3
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Postby alphager » Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:19 pm

your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php
Cunny Funt
level1
level1
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:29 pm

Postby Cunny Funt » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:27 am

alphager wrote:your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php



Haven't seen a site with ZERO errors...


http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.i ... ype=Inline
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.e ... ype=Inline

Google with 47 errors on FIRST place on my list now
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.g ... ype=Inline



Alphager stop being an asshole and smart ass and try to make your own site which hasen't one single error in it.
You have no kindness and your snootiness is beyond anything... I hope you get it.


I really appreciate your friend's work Nick.
Last edited by Cunny Funt on Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:50 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Spacemonkey
level4
level4
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:31 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby Spacemonkey » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:30 am

When launching a nuclear attack with subs, you want to be as close as possible to the target.


Thats a stupid tactic, if subs surface right next to an enemy coastline, they will get destroyed instantly by bombers.

Best why is to launch from outside the enemy's radar range, that why he will have to fly out to the subs to see them before the bombers can start shooting at them, by then, most of the nukes will be away.
PsychicKid
level2
level2
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:17 am

Postby PsychicKid » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:31 am

Spacemonkey wrote:
When launching a nuclear attack with subs, you want to be as close as possible to the target.


Thats a stupid tactic, if subs surface right next to an enemy coastline, they will get destroyed instantly by bombers.

Best why is to launch from outside the enemy's radar range, that why he will have to fly out to the subs to see them before the bombers can start shooting at them, by then, most of the nukes will be away.


The only disadvantage is you won't be able to hit all of your targets if you're too far out.
User avatar
shinygerbil
level5
level5
Posts: 4667
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Out, finding my own food. Also, doing the shinyBonsai Manoeuvre(tm)
Contact:

Postby shinygerbil » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:46 am

PsychicKid wrote:
Spacemonkey wrote:
When launching a nuclear attack with subs, you want to be as close as possible to the target.


Thats a stupid tactic, if subs surface right next to an enemy coastline, they will get destroyed instantly by bombers.

Best why is to launch from outside the enemy's radar range, that why he will have to fly out to the subs to see them before the bombers can start shooting at them, by then, most of the nukes will be away.


The only disadvantage is you won't be able to hit all of your targets if you're too far out.


So what you need to do is get as far away as you can whilst still being in range of your targets.
Here is my signature. Make of it what you will.
Image
prozachar
level1
level1
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:57 pm

Postby prozachar » Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:37 am

Cunny Funt wrote:Haven't seen a site with ZERO errors...


http://www.csszengarden.com

Valid HTML-strict and CSS.
Cunny Funt
level1
level1
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:29 pm

Postby Cunny Funt » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:04 am

prozachar wrote:
Cunny Funt wrote:Haven't seen a site with ZERO errors...


http://www.csszengarden.com

Valid HTML-strict and CSS.



Congratulation. *clap* *clap* *clap*
Sticks and Stones
level0
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:19 pm
Contact:

No errors

Postby Sticks and Stones » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:21 pm

Validates now! :D
Sunburn1979
level1
level1
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby Sunburn1979 » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:19 pm

alphager wrote:your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php



How you know he's a webdesigner ?
User avatar
NeoThermic
Introversion Staff
Introversion Staff
Posts: 6254
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 10:55 am
Location: ::1
Contact:

Postby NeoThermic » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:01 am

Cunny Funt wrote:
alphager wrote:your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php



Haven't seen a site with ZERO errors...


http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... mic.com%2F

NeoThermic
alphager
level3
level3
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Postby alphager » Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:42 am

Sunburn1979 wrote:
alphager wrote:your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php



How you know he's a webdesigner ?

I can't remember how i got that info; either from the whois-info on that domain, or he had a link to his business somewhere.
Either way, the site has been fixed.

Cunny Funt: It is pretty easy to write pages compliant with the standards. Google does not comply because of a simple reason: the site is so simple that it works with every browser, and if they added the doctype, it would augment their traffic-bill by several terrabyte.
User avatar
shinygerbil
level5
level5
Posts: 4667
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Out, finding my own food. Also, doing the shinyBonsai Manoeuvre(tm)
Contact:

Postby shinygerbil » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:55 am

NeoThermic wrote:
Cunny Funt wrote:
alphager wrote:your friend has no web-skills, even though he is a webdesigner.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... /index.php



Haven't seen a site with ZERO errors...


http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... mic.com%2F

NeoThermic


Code: Select all

I got the following unexpected response when trying to retrieve <http://www.neothermic.com/>:

500 Server closed connection without sending any data back


Bad NeoThermic. :D Yes, it does indeed validate!
Sunburn1979
level1
level1
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby Sunburn1979 » Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:44 pm

Cool :)
User avatar
NeoThermic
Introversion Staff
Introversion Staff
Posts: 6254
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 10:55 am
Location: ::1
Contact:

Postby NeoThermic » Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:17 pm

shinygerbil wrote:

Code: Select all

I got the following unexpected response when trying to retrieve <http://www.neothermic.com/>:

500 Server closed connection without sending any data back


Bad NeoThermic. :D Yes, it does indeed validate!


Unless you left your HTTP spec handbook at home, a 500 error has nothing to do with me or the XHTML on my site. Ineed, a 500 error is a server error. ;)

NeoThermic

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests