But even he will grow old and decrepid.

Since what TomCat39 was speculating on would happen outside the universe, the laws of science as we know them might not be laws there. As for the general concept, it's like someone* said: It's been a theme in Sci-Fi, and (as far as I know) there's nothing in the scientific body of knowledge that mi...

Xander, I'm not sure what path you were leading me on with the geometry laws. I only saw excerpts so do not fully comprehend what those two mathematicians formulas have to do with the big bang. I did some reading on the big bang via Wikipedia and understand that it's still believed to be one localiz...

I also want to note, not everything is moving away from us. If this were true we wouldn't have craters nor be worried about being hit by more random rocks. Nor would the moon look like swiss cheese. I will look into those reads concerning big bang theory. I'm going by my understanding of what was t...

I also want to note, not everything is moving away from us. If this were true we wouldn't have craters nor be worried about being hit by more random rocks. Nor would the moon look like swiss cheese. I will look into those reads concerning big bang theory. I'm going by my understanding of what was ta...

Being that there is a center to our universe and as far as I know, an outside edge (which is still expanding)... Incorrect. Modern cosmological models do not posit that there is a center or edge to the universe. Or, alternatively, every point is the center of the universe, as where ever you stand, ...

Being that there is a center to our universe and as far as I know, an outside edge (which is still expanding) that is definitely finite at any given moment in time. The number maybe changing as the universe grows, still doesn't make it infinite. And what I said as a concept is the idea of our univer...

Actually I've never once heard the question phrased as "chicken egg" only "egg". So no it's not obviously referring to a "chicken egg". Yes, it is. The adage is meant to highlight the ambigious nature of mutually causal relationships. That is lost if you're talking abo...

Your creation story has none of those things, thus it is not a theory. xander I believe I purposely avoided calling it a theory. If I did call it a theory then please forgive my error. I thought I called it a concept, and have been thinking of it as such the whole time. I see my error. first line. ...

Thank you for the clarifications stewsburntmonkey and feud. I wasn't aware of which theory it depicted nor current day observations of our universe.

It rather settles that as a little probability concept.

Thank you again.

Now before you go dismissing this thread, let me get this unconventional creationist concept on paper first. Please read this odd idea first, then reply as you wish. I'm sure most have seen something depicting how the world gets smaller and smaller and smaller and vice versa. And how it all seems to...

What? Someone had posted that before? Oh, sorry. Twice, even. xander I should have posted a smiley, I see. :P No, I understood the implied smiley. Perhaps it is I that should have included a colon followed by a capital pee. xander That be one serious Pee if it's a CAPITAL pee. Hope it doesn't hurt ...

Yeah, I think we are all in agreement there. I had asked how one could argue otherwise though. And that was what shinygerbil was answering respectably. And I too agree with an earlier poster about it being a semantic exercise possibly to obfuscate the theory of evolution. Still thought it be interes...

No debate over which came first? The chicken or the egg? It only goes to reason the egg came first being chickens are born from eggs. A mutated fertilization of some fowl creature spawned the first "chicken egg". The egg was then laid and incubated to birth the first chicken. It only make...

Damn I'm getting old, everyone here is the typical "I know everything" kid. ;-p

37/male/West Coast Canada