You dont understand why i want a limited number of setups? With all random some will get to play better setuos than others. Somebody will be at the disadvantage. Why have that if we try to determine whos the best now? If i have to play as EU or Russia against Africa a couple of times, what does that...
Only 6 players tourney?....well in generall i'm all for it as always, but why exclude the rest of the population? Mainly rusMike and I are to blame. We came up with the idea of exclusive show games between the Masters of Defcon. But it somehow envolved into Aces Boss Tourney (hes to blame for that)...
The limited random isn't a good idea, why we are bosses then if we are afraid from some setups ? We want equality. Whats the point in playing Asia vs Russia? Also as this way each one from us will have an idea about the setups that he can get and preapare only for those setups.. And much others thi...
With that idea we don't need to reverse, but I think random setups will be more interessing and more challanging.. And more unfair. Why should we risk that you ll get North vs South in every game you choose to play? I dont see why we shouldnt do a reverse setup with this. Nice suggestion Nightwatch...
Why not give the players an option to chose between a limited number of setups.
NA EU, SA Africa, and Africa Asia for example.
That way we can have a little randomness and a get a real picture of whos the best.
141 MOR 163 Nightwatch 23 Phönix 92 Turgon 55 http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8381/54138584.th.png Uploaded with ImageShack.us 142 Night 149 Senator 80 LSWP 105 jon 8 http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2894/29554935.th.png Uploaded with ImageShack.us
i'm off to vacation, no Defcon for me until next sunday at the earliest
dont do anything stupid while iam away and keep the tourney going until i come back
so glad that i wont see you all for the week