I think Jordy left because of this suggestion of yours to put DEFCON on the VirtualBoy.

And you're still trying to put a whole other, basically tangential game into Prison Architect.

I'm afraid your suggestion for a ROMZOMCOMMMOFPS just won't work. There's not enough owls in the teraflops.

It sounds like you want to play a football manager game with infinitely more corruption. I'm not sure why you expect Chris to not only embrace corruption to borderline cartoonish levels but to also have prisoner sporting teams become such a big deal.

The contrary opinions stink and you don't speak for the entire group.

I don't want to test bang up/lockdown at all. It seems like an unrewarding pain in the ass. It's not my job, I don't have to do it and there's no great reward if I did it in this state. Why not wait until next month to tell them what I don't like about it?

But it was already known to work, and any bugs will have been reported long long ago. Anyways, that argument about testing could be applied to features not yet implemented too. Surely it makes more sense to get new features pushed out ASAP for testing instead of a relatively small, already extensiv...

Has Pac-man in two places at once. Not canon.

The edges of the foundation have their own walls and the door goes on one of them.

Demand something a little better than before, then maybe receive it.

Fuck me, reading this shit again is mortifying.

You can expect ZERO testing between "releases". Not 10 minutes, not an hour, none. This is an Alpha of a crowd-funded game, and game-breaking bugs are to be expected. We are the testers. Found a bug? Good for you, submit it to the bug tracker. No. You can expect better than zero testing, ...

It clearly shows the assumption that even later, if the game went on sale, the people that would then buy it are the type of people to bitch about the bugs. That's what that quote says. Not sure how you could interpret it in any other way. That's the end of the quote as well. Nothing after it, no f...

They are saying if you won't pay for the game at $30, you're probably just going to bitch about it being broken. You've got it backwards. If you're going to bitch about the game being broken, you probably won't pay $30 for it. The problem with that is that they'll just go pirate it instead. It does...

Then you know the answer and you know THEY said it. Did you want to hear it a second time or something? It's a 9 month old article and you're assuming they still use the same reasoning. For all you know, they may be now shooting to make it a game worth $30. Or maybe they think it's already worth $3...