No problem. It's not needed. There is no tourney. This thread is still in announcements just as a monument to the tour officials's failure. :D I may have posted somewhere in a different topic regarding this 1v1 on how i feared the tourney would fail on pretty much the same lines as Coke's 2013 Wint...

If i were honest i feel sry for XB as he was focusing on a mass bomber wave in russian artic (which he could have coordinated better with scout wave/escorts going first to check for radar on the edge). Too busy managing some 3 dozen bombers to forget about the one that was 'forever alone'...

How 2 nuke bombers (starring XB-70): http://i.imgur.com/1zoiQC4.gifv Red bomber: "Screw this I quit red, I'll fly with you guys!" If that bomber was armed then holy shit...if i was green i would be breathing a massive sigh of relief he missed an open opportunity! EDIT: Found the rec and r...

When you get that 1 guy who reveals your plans in public:

Just avoid diplo if you ask me...but if you still want to play it then allow me to give a word of advice... ...don't take diplo seriously at all. Because Dave probably knows you will react like so if you are going to take a game so seriously. And as Kudayta said: It's Diplo. The Dane Cook version of...

Rad Poison wrote:MAX the MASTER best FFA

Even though i haven't faced him, i agree via screenshot evidence.

Well I don't ffa as much either, but ok.

As it is with every year with me, don't feel it. Not saying im a Scrooge...

...but...yea.

Uuh...the heck is the purpose of this kind of diplo? If any? it takes out the skill of knowing other players tactics. Pretty much like all other diplo games then, or in my eyes at least, be the biggest liar. :mrgreen: Tempting as it is to join and just play mind-games with noobs, i'll stick to team...

Sicilian Hound wrote:GROUP 6 | Anonymous Diplomacy | Premium

Uuh...the heck is the purpose of this kind of diplo? If any?

No expert on running servers (obv), but if you did then all those with 1.42 would end up left behind so to speak. Just my opinion.

Right, but those games are always fun right to the end, trying to get every last point. (: And thats what made mine so intense. :D Dat feeling of relief when it was over...i may have noobed up here and there (and in general really) but man, it is a game for me to remember for a while. Still need to...

I had a similar game in terms of the score. Won by 1 point, and collateral made a noticable difference. I lost pretty much every unit too. But was worth it in the end. Damn lucky for that win, all down to the collateral... :oops: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=255930028

I'm not entirely sure, but if you were to went on to options > other, there should be a "Pop-up Scale" which you can use to increase or decrease the fonts. Again i'm not so sure, you could just do a derpy test game with the bots just to find out what it really does.

I think he means a 1v1 tourney. Also imo 1v1 tourneys will probably be easier to arrange, no waiting around for your ally at all as you would in a 2v2 tourney to arrange a set match, and then the extra bit of more hassling when the game ends up not counting due to player having to leave or whatever ...