Quote: from Darkshine on 4:13 pm on July 12, 2003[br]All I can say is this - Yesterday I purchased a shiny new Powerbook running a 1 Ghz G4 and I must say that, despite the price (im willing to admit £2000 is steep) it is the single greatest piece of electronic equipment I have ever used. EVER. So ...

Quote: from gvirus on 2:33 am on June 20, 2003[br]but i just dont c the point in spending thousands of dollors, on a computer that dont run most of the software out there, is only 1.42Ghz CPU,  the ram is low, the screen isn't even included, you cant even have that many drives in there cuz of where...

Quote: from Ionas on 6:01 am on June 17, 2003[br]I see the  the old diplomatic half-truth that macs are better for multimedia editing is still maintained. With wonderful apps like Photoshop and Cubase reaching macs and pcs simultaneously, and hardware being streamlined, I would say that this hasn't...

Quote: from Stewsburntmonkey on 4:19 am on June 17, 2003[br]I should point out that the Mac port was not done by Chris, but handled by Contraband Ent.   In general Macs are more stable than PCs simply because of the control Apple has over nearly every aspect of the Mac.  They control the hardware a...

Quote: from Rkiver on 6:12 pm on June 15, 2003[br]Ok so a piece of machinery is better then a piece of software? If you are going to compare something at least compare the same things............Comparing an OS to something that an OS runs on...why not compare a Ferrari F50 to Unleaded Petrol....se...

Quote: from Icepick on 11:11 am on June 15, 2003[br]Stability is a moot point if there isn't actually anything to run on the thing ;) And that is just plain ignorance... I don't feel like going through all the points... but it boils down to: The Apple system is more powerful, more stable, gives you...

Quote: from Hektik sniper on 7:29 am on June 14, 2003[br]maybe if u didnt use a mac and used a real computer you wouldnt have problems

Ture, however, the problems I would have are not worth it.