"Blind" Targeting

In-depth tactical discussion on how to lose the least

Moderator: Defcon moderators

How useful do you think this could be?

You guys are gonna be pawned!
10
30%
Meh, we'll see.
7
21%
You're a mad man I tell you, MAD!
3
9%
I like pie!
13
39%
 
Total votes: 33
User avatar
Feud
level5
level5
Posts: 5149
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Blackacre, VA

Postby Feud » Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:13 pm

Hyperion wrote:
And that's why the south lost the war :roll: stubborn fools.


Actually, in many ways the South used much more dynamic and innovative tactics than the North, and are usually credited by having far superior officers and soldiers (on a man to man basis). They were mainly hampered by a lack of foreign recognition, the inability to break the Northern blockade, and being vastly outnumbered in both men and supplies.

For instance the South were the first to successfully use a combat submarine, the first to deploy an iron clad warship, one of the first to use anti personal land mines, and went toe to toe with a vastly numerically superior force for four years (and were largely successful for most of it).

Stubborn? Yes. Wrong? Yes. Fools? Certainly not.
User avatar
creator
level3
level3
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:57 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Postby creator » Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:21 am

I think this could be very effective when after those nasty naval battles you find your self with one lonesome carrier.

Return to “Strategic Air Command”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests