/

In-depth tactical discussion on how to lose the least

Moderator: Defcon moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
HomelandSecurity
level0
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:26 am
Contact:
Contact HomelandSecurity

/

Postby HomelandSecurity » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:54 am

sorry dual post i is stoopid
Last edited by HomelandSecurity on Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
Radiant Caligula
level5
level5
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:47 am
Location: Somewhere sodomized

Postby Radiant Caligula » Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:02 am

that silo placement may look good on paper, and it's not completely useless. But trust me - if you play advanced players that setup wouldn't last very long once discovered. the outer silos have too little protection and the structure is too easy to break apart.

I would go for a tighter setup, either a hexagon or a triangle. Even a double row would perform better than this one IMHO. that's my 2 cents.
-First you wanna kill me. Now you wanna kiss me?? BLOW!
Top
Bunnet
level1
level1
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Scotland

Postby Bunnet » Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:40 am

that fleet set up is rather standard but has a huge weakness to subs...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Air Command”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests