Search found 7 matches
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:00 pm
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:52 pm
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
--==<snip>==-- First off, don't conflate my ideas with the author's ideas. I linked to an article, without comment. Second, I think you have rather missed the point. The author is discussing tournament play, and explaining why a certain group of people tends to lose in tournament play. They lose be...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:04 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: BLACK LIST
- Replies: 196
- Views: 44350
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:19 am
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
- Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:00 pm
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
Carriers are definitely more valuable. They're moving airbases, that have huge radar and sub hunt. However, what's a carrier without any bombers? Without any planes? It's a sitting duck... with a nice view. That depends - if they're in the middle of the ocean, the view can be really blue and really...
- Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:29 pm
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
There are lots of counters: a) Kill the bombers before they get into launching range, so that they don't do any damage; b) Kill the bombers after they get into launching range, so that they never come back; c) Dodge (maneuvre) with you fleet to minimise damage; d) MOAR naval nuking than your enemy ...
- Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:12 pm
- Forum: Strategic Air Command
- Topic: Anti-Naval nuking
- Replies: 33
- Views: 54100
Anti-Naval nuking
I've been getting more and more frustrated with naval nuking. I don't use it as a strategy, and don't think people should use it, but that's for a whole different thread (if at all, since I don't see any way of policing games to prevent naval nuking). I'm not entirely against ALL naval nuking - I of...