it's a emulator, that emulates the windows environment...
and it's NOT an option.

what about mac-users?

actually it's http://code.welterde.de/jlink/
i dumped the sourceforge-page....

well... there is already such an project...
at least kind of....
JLink!

of course you can help! help is always welcome^^ i am still working on an somhow cool network protocol(draft there: http://code.welterde.de/jlink/wiki/Protocol ) multiplayer will range from small to large^^ eg. everyone can setup a server and get it listed on a meta-server, like in tremulous/bzflag/...

64 Byte Killer wrote:warrant recoding in a more powerful language, basically C++.

well... if your project doesnt include 3d stuff, C++ isnt more powerful than .NET or java, because due the dynamic nature of java and .NET, you can do things in those languages you wont be able to do that easy in c++.

Well... how about starting an development-blog?

shinygerbil wrote:C++ was originally called "C with Classes", I believe. It can be backwards-compatible without being all that similar.

true, but C++ isnt __very__ different

It's a basic! All basics are bad! well gambas seems to be not that bad, but for some small apps i prefer ruby, except for stuff that need an GUI, there i use Java Which language you talking about with the non-OO? C? I said C++. Very different. Very OO. very different: C++ is totally compatible with...

do you mean a executable or a JAR-file?

As far as im aware its strong point isn't 3D movements but that can be written in C/C++ anyway. I reckon as Stew was saying to me that the core functions could have been written in C/C++ or he may be right in saying it was all written in Python. I know the game logic was written in Python, but the ...

Gave the impression in your earlier post the entire game was made of it, was going to say that sounded a bit far-fetched. Was it used alongside another language then? i guess the gfx-engine is written either C or C++, because python propably is/was too slow for an gfx-engine Stewsburntmonkey: it ca...

Ah I see. Isn't python more suited for text manipulation rather than a general purpose language? Python is a general purpose language. Perl is and will likely remain for the foreseeable future the lord of text manipulation. Is python suitable enough for a project of the magnitude of either Eve-Onli...

that may be, main-thing ruby misses is an JIT but hey, for 95% of things the speed is ok :) Certainly, I develop mainly in Perl these days which is certainly not the fastest language out there. Perl is good for web applications isn't it? Not sure about the suitability of it in general purpose progr...

that may be, main-thing ruby misses is an JIT but hey, for 95% of things the speed is ok :) Certainly, I develop mainly in Perl these days which is certainly not the fastest language out there. Perl is good for web applications isn't it? Not sure about the suitability of it in general purpose progr...